Gauff calls for the addition of non-mandatory WTA 1000 events allowing players to withdraw; Jovic expresses admiration for Djokovic

The recent withdrawals of world number one Sabalenka and five-time Grand Slam winner Swiatek from the Dubai event have sparked broad discussion. In an interview before the Dubai tournament, American rising star Gauff defended the two top players and highlighted problems within the WTA’s structure.

“I truly don’t believe they pulled out simply because they didn’t want to compete,” Gauff stated solemnly. “It’s not a rash choice. When you consider the physical and mental fatigue accumulated over the year… even if it doesn’t affect you immediately, it will impact you later.”

The American star admitted that the transition period after the Australian Open is always extremely tough for her. When asked whether players should lose points for missing such tournaments, Gauff gave a clear no: “I don’t really agree with that. There are already mandatory events. When we skip those, we don’t get any ranking points.”

Gauff further analyzed the harshness of the current schedule: “At this stage in the calendar, I think it’s very difficult to play every event, especially since most tournaments last two weeks. The expectations on players are increasing.” She also showed understanding for tournament organizers: “I get their perspective too. Of course, they want players to attend. In the past, top players always participated in Doha and Dubai, so the fields were strong. I understand that this year’s situation is unfortunate.”

Based on this, Gauff proposed a constructive idea, citing ATP’s successful example: “I don’t think it’s fair to deduct points from players. In my view, we should have an optional WTA 1000 event, like the Monte Carlo tournament in men’s tennis.”

This proposal quickly sparked heated discussion. Tennis veteran and ESPN commentator Pam Shriver commented on social media: “Gauff’s suggestion is very mature and constructive. With both men’s and women’s tours extending, players face higher risks of injury and burnout. An ‘optional’ top-level event would indeed give players valuable flexibility, helping protect top athletes’ careers and making tournament lineups more adaptable.”

If Gauff’s remarks represent rational thinking, then American rising star Jovic’s words in Dubai were filled with pure love and admiration.

This young American woman, after defeating Rasimova 6-1, 1-6, 6-1 in the first round of the Dubai singles, openly expressed her idolization of Djokovic. Facing the camera, she was almost “tongue-tied”: “Oh my god, I really wish I could do it, but I don’t know if I’m brave enough. I get a bit nervous when I talk to him; he’s definitely my idol.”

Jovic described Djokovic’s pervasive influence in her eyes: “Wherever I go, I see him everywhere. I think to myself: how many titles has this guy won? He’s on every screen.” Finally, with determined eyes, she voiced her dream: “I just want to work hard to be like Novak, plain and simple. I will keep pushing like this.”

This fan-like statement quickly spread online, resonating widely. Renowned tennis journalist Jon Wertheim commented: “In today’s era, it’s wonderful that young players openly express their admiration for legends and see it as motivation to move forward. Djokovic’s 24 Grand Slam titles are more than just numbers; they are a beacon guiding newcomers like Jovic.”

These two news stories sparked distinct yet equally passionate discussions among tennis fans.

Regarding Gauff’s proposal for reforming the system, some netizens said, “Gauff is absolutely right! The current schedule treats players like workhorses. Two-week 1000-level tournaments are exhausting both physically and mentally. Supporting the introduction of ‘exempt’ events like Monte Carlo.” Others commented, “Of course, organizers want big names, but player health is fundamental. Sabalenka and Swiatek’s withdrawals are actually warning signs from their bodies. WTA really needs to listen to the players.” Some also noted, “Gauff’s vision is impressive; she’s not just speaking for herself but fighting for the whole player community’s rights.”

Regarding Jovic’s “fan” remarks, some commented, “Haha, isn’t this just me as a fan? ‘He’s on every screen’—so true! Jovic is a shining example of a successful fan.” Others said, “I’m a fan now! This kind of honest admiration is a thousand times more charming than fake compliments. Hopefully, Jovic can carry this idolization forward and carve out her own path.”

Whether it’s Gauff’s thoughtful reflections on system reform or Jovic’s reverence for her idol, both together paint an authentic picture of today’s tennis world: seeking progress amid structural challenges while drawing strength from spiritual legacy.(Source: Tennis Home, Author: Lu Xiaotian)